Basics of Contributory Negligence
Determining who is legally responsible (“at fault”) for a motor vehicle accident can be a difficult process. Add in North Carolina’s contributory negligence law, and determining liability can sometimes become a nearly impossible feat.
In North Carolina, the doctrine of contributory negligence essentially bars an injured party from receiving recovery if the damages suffered are partially their own fault. North Carolina is one of only four states to still follow this old common law principle. Under this rule, whenever a person is found to share any responsibility for his or her damages, they are barred from recovering compensation for those damages. This means that even if you are found to be only 1 percent at fault for an accident, you cannot collect damages from the other party, despite the other party being 99 percent at fault.
“[A] plaintiff’s contributory negligence is a bar to recovery from a defendant who commits an act of ordinary negligence.” Sorrells v. M.Y.B. Hospitality Ventures, 332 N.C. 645, 648 (1992). This is not to say your situation is hopeless, even if you believe you may have contributed to your damages. There are exceptions to contributory negligence that can be asserted, and they will be briefly discussed later in this article.
Call Wallace Pierce Law today at (919) 887-7892 to reach our Durham attorneys. With more than a decade of experience, we know how to help you get back on your feet.
Determining Liability
To determine liability, an injured party must first prove that the at-fault driver was negligent. But even if you are able to prove negligence, the at-fault driver may be able to avoid liability by establishing a defense of contributory negligence. In North Carolina, contributory negligence is a defense to a claim of negligence. The doctrine of contributory negligence bars the plaintiff from recovering any compensation if the defendant can prove that the plaintiff acted negligently and contributed to the damages in any way. In order to establish contributory negligence, a defendant must prove that the plaintiff contributed to the damages to some degree.
So How Do I Know If I was Contributorily Negligent?
In determining negligence, North Carolina follows the ordinary/reasonable care standard. This means every person is required to use reasonable care to protect his or her own safety as well as the safety of others. If you fail to do so, you are likely being negligent and could be considered partly at fault if you are involved in an accident.
Everyone has a duty to use ordinary care to protect oneself and others from injury or damage. Ordinary care means the degree of care that a reasonable person would use under the same or similar circumstances. “A plaintiff is contributorily negligent when he fails to exercise such care as an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under the circumstances in order to avoid injury.” Newton v. New Hanover County Board of Education, 342 N.C. 554, 564 (1996). For more information on negligence please visit our article on the topic.
Important Note: In North Carolina, contributory negligence typically applies when the plaintiff actually contributed to the cause of the accident. For example, if a plaintiff was speeding, but it was shown that speeding didn’t cause the accident, the plaintiff will not be barred from recovery. With this being said, remember the 1 percent threshold is a very small burden to overcome. Therefore, it would likely be a very tall task to prove that your speeding did not to some degree contribute to your damages.
-
“When my 4-year old son and I were involved in a terrible head-on collision, I wasn't sure where to turn. Wallace Pierce has been great showing me the way!”- Mary P.
-
“Richard Dingus is a great attorney! And I think the best, serving in the state of North Carolina. I would recommend him for injury and bodily claim any day.”- Isaac B.
-
“They were concerned not only about getting our vehicle replaced, but more importantly my kid’s full recovery.”- Coral M.
-
“I retained this law firm to fight my case. I was completely shocked at the amount I received once the case was won.”- Schjuana S.
-
“Mr. Pierce gave me practical advice and was very thorough in guiding me through the process. I left with a strong and positive impression of him.”- Audria L.
-
“Was able to either point me in the right direction or answer any questions I had regarding the accident I was in. Thank you!”- Steven L.
-
“Great Law Firm, Friendly Staff, Amazing Service. Willing to help you every step of the way.”- Caleb M.
-
“I could not recommend anyone any higher than I recommend Wallace Pierce Law, they get the job done and they do it quicker and better and keep you informed along the way.”- Debby L.
featured
Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.
-
$1,900,000 Wrongful Death
The at-fault driver failed to reduce speed and collided with our client's vehicle. Our client passed away shortly after the collision.
-
$900,000 Wrongful Death
Our client was thrown from his motorcycle and was pronounced deceased on the scene.
-
$122,000 Car Accident
Vehicle made a left-hand turn, failing to yield the right of way.
-
$104,000 Serious Injuries
Client was a passenger in a vehicle that was driving through an intersection when another vehicle ran a stop sign and t-boned the vehicle our client was in.
-
$104,000 Severe Injury
We were able to not only receive policy limits for our client but were able to negotiate her medical bills and liens to ensure that she was able to keep a good portion of the settlement.
-
$102,000 Serious Injuries
Elderly client was a passenger in a vehicle that was t-boned in an intersection where a driver failed to yield the right of way.